SWG 14 – Qualitative Research Methods for the Advancement of Organization Studies


Coordinators

Thomas Greckhamer, Lousiana State University, US
Tine Köhler, University of Melbourne, Australia
Jane K. Lê, WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Germany
 

Standing Working Group (SWG) 14 provides a platform to connect and build a community of scholars developing innovative and impactful qualitative research methods to advance organization theory.

A focus on research methods is essential to the advancement of organization studies. Rigorous and innovative qualitative research methods have the potential to enable empirical research that produces field-transforming theoretical insights. Hence, they are critical to the development of organization studies as an empirical and theoretical field. Indeed, organizational researchers are increasingly illuminating the important relationship between methods and theory (Bansal et al., 2018; Gephart, 2004; Köhler et al., 2025; Pratt, 2008; Pratt & Bonaccio, 2016).
 
Our academic aim with this SWG is to provide a platform for scholars to advance the qualitative research methods debate. We seek to consolidate and advance qualitative organizational research methods scholarship by bringing together researchers working on critically examining and extending such methods in ways that enable an exciting new generation of organizational research. Our three objectives are thus:

1. Supporting Innovative and Flexible Qualitative Research

This SWG will help to advance qualitative research methods in ways that safeguard their flexibility and potential for ‘creative bricolage’ (Cilesiz & Greckhamer, 2022; Pratt, Sonenshein & Feldman, 2022), enabling ongoing access to varied questions, contexts and data
 

(e.g., Denzin & Lincoln, 2017; Gehman et al., 2018; Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Pratt et al., 2022; Yin, 2009), ultimately facilitating innovation (Lê & Schmid, 2022) and ‘theoretical divergence’ (Cornelissen, 2017).

2. Advancing Methodological Approaches that Support Theorizing

This SWG brings together researchers who seek to create and equip an analytic toolbox of advanced analytical techniques that facilitates “disciplined imagination” (Weick, 1989), “conceptual leaping” (Klag & Langley, 2013; Langley, 1999), “generative doubt” (Locke et al., 2008; Locke et. al., 2022), “contemplation” (Bartunek, 2019), and “interpretive rigor” (Mees-Buss et al., 2022) that are so central to emerging contribution in organization studies.

3. Building a European Community of Qualitative Research Methods Scholars

This SWG will enrich the academic community via a concerted effort to bring together qualitative research methods scholars, complementing efforts on the North American continent (e.g., RMD@AOM, CARMA). Building a stronger European base that embraces philosophically and methodologically rich European scholarship will be beneficial for qualitative methods scholars. This will diversify and invigorate organizational research.

References

  • Bansal, P., Smith, W.K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61 (4), 1189-1195.
  • Bartunek, J. M. (2019). Contemplation and Organization Studies: Why contemplative activities are so crucial for our academic lives. Organization Studies, 40 (10), 1463-1479.
  • Cilesiz, S., & Greckhamer, T. (2022). Methodological socialization and identity: a bricolage study of pathways toward qualitative research in doctoral education. Organizational Research Methods, 25 (2), 337-370.
  • Cornelissen, J. (2017). Preserving theoretical divergence in management research: Why the explanatory potential of qualitative research should be harnessed rather than suppressed. Journal of Management Studies, 53 (3), 368-383.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. (5 ed.) Sage Publishing.
  • Gehman, J., Glaser, V., Eisenhardt, K., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. (2018). Finding theory-method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27 (3), 284-300.
  • Gephart, R. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4), 454-462.
  • Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company: Chicago.
  • Klag, M., & Langley, A. (2013). Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15 (2), 149–166.
  • Köhler, T., Smith, A., Greckhamer, T., & Lê, J. (2025). Feature Topic for ORM: Advanced analytic approaches to theorize from qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 28 (2), 330-334.
  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710.
  • Lê, J. K., & Schmid, T. (2022). The practice of innovating research methods. Organizational Research Methods, 25 (2), 308-336.
  • Locke, K., Feldman, M., & Golden-Biddle, K. (2022). Coding practices and iterativity: beyond templates for analyzing qualitative data. Organizational Research Methods, 25 (2), 262–284.
  • Locke, K., Golden-Biddle, K., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Perspective—making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19 (6), 907-918.
  • Mees-Buss, J., Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2022). From templates to heuristics: how and why to move beyond the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 25 (2), 405-429.
  • Pratt, M. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11 (3), 481-509.
  • Pratt, M. G., & Bonaccio, S. (2016). Qualitative research in IO psychology: Maps, myths, and moving forward. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9 (4), 693-715.
  • Pratt, M. G., Sonenshein, S., & Feldman, M. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational research methods, 25 (2), 211-238.
  • Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 516–531.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

About the Coordinators

Thomas Greckhamer is the William Rucks IV Endowed Chair and Professor of Management at Louisiana State University. He earned his PhD from the University of Florida. His research focuses on configurational and discourse-oriented approaches to strategic management, qualitative research methodology, and qualitative comparative analysis. His research has been published in leading journals including Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Management, Organization Science, Organization Studies, Organization, and Organizational Research Methods. He is currently associate editor at Organizational Research Methods.

Tine Köhler is Professor of International Management at the University of Melbourne. Her research focuses on Global Teamwork and Research Methods and Statistics. Her main research interests include cross-cultural management, communication and coordination, group processes, qualitative research methods, research design, meta-analysis, and regression. She is co-editor-in-chief of Organizational Research Methods and former associate editor of Academy of Management Learning and Education and Organizational Research Methods. Her work has been published in leading journals such as Journal of Management, Organizational Research Methods, Human Resource Management, Journal of International Business Studies, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, and Psychological Methods.

Jane Lê holds the Chair of Strategic Management at the WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management. She studies practices and processes in organizations to better understand how people respond to strategic complexity. She is passionate about qualitative research and qualitative research methods. Her preferred method involves immersive real-time observation of organizations, utilizing such data to uncover consequential process dynamics. She has published interpretive work in the Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, Organization Studies, and Strategic Organization, among others. She is currently associate editor at Organizational Research Methods and past editor of Research Methodology in Strategy and Management.