The background of this Standing Working Group (SWG from here on) includes emerging societal trends that have resulted in a
symbolic initiative on EU-level called The New European Bauhaus (NEB). This 2 political vision – beautiful |sustainable | together – has resulted in policies that drive research and development
in the European Union today. Hundreds of millions of Euros have been dedicated to stimulate, support, research and develop
a more enriching, sustainable, and inclusive life for citizens (Ibid.) As an example, as this proposal is written (early October
2022) a new €50 million call is launched by the European Urban Initiative to support ‘innovative proposals aimed at urban
development’ described as perfect for translating into practice the core values of The New Bauhaus vision. Emerging trends
sustaining the NEB vision are: an increasingly digitalized society and creative economy (with subsequent developments of innovative
business models and new organizational challenges; Amit and Zott, 2012; McKinlay & Smith, 2009; Raviola, 2017), climate changes
urging us to seek out new modes and models for production and making such that a more sustainable economy and society can
be achieved (Bouchard, 2012; Johnsen, Olaison & Sørensen, 2018; Duxbury, 2021), and the related surge of interest in craft-based
making of food, beverages, and things, which is often tied in local, sustainable production, re-use economy, and the concern
for quality that follows from this (Bell and Vachhani, 2020; Gasparin and Neyland, 2022).
In terms of organization studies, this is interesting and important for several reasons. Firstly, these trends or tendencies in society and the economy drive and are driven by relatively new forms of organizing that we
may call rhizomatic and operating in more assemblage-like modes (Hjorth and Holt, 2022). As such, they seem to draw upon the
recent development of a more process-oriented knowledge, theory and methodology in organization studies (Helin, Hernes, Hjorth
and Holt, 2014; Langley and Tsoukas, 2017). Secondly, they do also reflect a tendency – manifest primarily in the design boom experienced during the last two decades – that the
aesthetic-economy relationship has become increasingly important for users’/citizens’/ consumers’ judgment of what is valuable
(Austin, Hjorth, & Hessel, 2018; Islam, Endrissat & Noppeney, 2016; Stigliani & Ravasi, 2018; Cacciatore & Panozzo, 2022).
Thirdly and finally, these trends point us to a more than two decades long evolution of more local- and community-based forms of organizing
the economy, in which craft culture and craft businesses play a central role. Together we see these converge into a crossroad
where a future of potentially more inclusive, sustainable and creative organizations and society are at stake.
We find organizational research on craft is moving into a second wave, where not only the aesthetic-economic relationship
is important, but also the cultural-historical perspective, and the ecological in terms of craft as a model for making and
a source of community and localregional identity (Wadhwani et al, 2019).